“The Day #AskAgent Trended on Twitter…”

The askagent hashtag on Twitter is a wonderful and sometimes rare way for writers to directly connect with agents and get answers to their questions about manuscripts, genres, tastes, how agents work, policies, and the publishing industry in general. Late Tuesday night when I announced I’d be doing an #askagent session the next day, I had no idea the controversy that would arise from the session.

I don’t really want to talk about the controversy. We’ve been over it and it’s finished. But I will say, it became such an issue, #askagent lasted all day and night. And trended on Twitter. CRAZY!

You can read this article for all the details but what I want you to come away with is actually a comment left by an anonymous agent. It offers great advice (corrects false advice that was offered that day on Twitter) and clearly defines an agent’s job:

Anon says:
June 14, 2012 at 4:31 pm

1. There’s no such thing as an Author’s Manager. That’s a made-up title apparently modeled after a position often required in the music industry. It shows a lack of understanding of the publishing industry.

2. What an agent does for a client is use their industry connections to get an author’s book in front of the big-6 publishers and vet/negotiate the contract with a publisher. As a “publisher,” which Mr. Rozansky claims to be, he cannot also be the “agent.” That’s skeevy and a conflict of interest. Also, his claims to do “much more” for his “clients” than an agent are false, as he has shown contempt for large publishers publicly in the past and has not shown that he has the connections to represent an author’s work in that arena. The #askagent tag is for aspiring authors to ask questions of ACTUAL agents.

3. The advice he offered under the #askagent tag was FALSE, or, at the very least, misleading. For example:

* “Rejection from agent on agency letterhead is rejection from the agency.” FALSE. The only time it’s not okay to query other agents within an agency is if the agency submission guidelines indicate that “a No from one of us is a No from all.” Also, in this era of e-queries, letterhead is used only by a select few who require communication to go via snail mail, anyway. And its presence or lack there of indicates exactly nothing when it comes to agency policy in this area.
* The question was asked “Uncommon for an agent to rep both adult & kids books? Hard to manage diff editors, markets, fairs etc?” and Mr. Rozansky answered: “You are correct. Juvenile and adult trade are two different worlds.” FALSE. There are many, MANY agents who represent both adult and children’s books. While they are two different worlds, many top agents find no problem in representing both effectively and with great success.
* Q: “When excited about a new client/ms do you always have someone else read it or just contact them asap?” DR answers, “Once I get excited, I’ll usually interview author. If that works out, I’ll do market research and use test readers.” This is not okay for an agent to do. Ever. Test readers and market research when an author has not signed with someone? NOT. OKAY. That is the author’s property for the sole eyes of the agent and the agency. The agent does not have the right to put it before the public in any shape or form.
* Q: “Is anyone really hunting for commercial fiction with a LGBT love story?” DR answers, “There are many piblishing houses with LGBT imprints. Check with LGBT bookstores to find them.” FALSE. Most major house imprints publish books with LGBT characters and love stories all the time. LGBT is not necessarily a segregated market. While there are small presses, anthologies, and magazines that ONLY publish LGBT stories, having an LGBT love story in your novel does not keep your book off of the shelves of all bookstores or off the the lists of any traditional publisher. If DR truly were an agent, with contacts within the publishing industry, he would know this.

I could go on and point to other glaring inaccuracies in his other answers, but I think this is enough to show why a legit agent would be concerned that someone is giving bad advice on a hashtag to authors who follow the tag to learn–especially when that person is not, in fact, an AGENT.

There is a lot of misinformation in the internet, and it is important to research and figure out who you trust. I’m sorry DR’s feelings were hurt by last night’s controversy, but I can’t be sad that he’ll no longer populate that tag with misinformation. It’s hard enough for new writers as it is.

4 thoughts on ““The Day #AskAgent Trended on Twitter…”

  1. Since I asked one of the questions you pointed out, I am pleased to get a fuller answer than the ones provided to me on twitter. I was thankful to have been warned by several of the legit agents about Mr. Rozansky’s lack of authority. I ignored his advice to me and others.

    I enjoy a good #AskAgent session whenever they happen, and was pleased I was paying attention to twitter on that day. Agents who participated thoughtfully moved up a few spots on my master list of agents to query.

    Obviously, I have no intention of contacting Mr. Rozansky.

  2. I spent the whole day watching and asking questions on that #askagent session, I loved every minute of it. DR didn’t respond to any of my questions, only actual agents did. I was amazed at their dedication to helping new writers.

    Though by the end of the day DR followed me on Twitter and added me to one of his “writer” lists. I have no intentions of following up on why he did so, I think I merely caught his interest and am curious to see if he is going to “check” up on me in the future.

  3. I’m sad that I missed what seemed to be a pretty interesting #askagent. I’ve tried to find those live tweets, but twitter doesn’t go back that far. DR is one of the reasons I stopped following #askagent. I’ve done my in-depth research into publishing for over 3 years now. I know I have to if I want to jump into shark-filled waters. I noticed when I first saw DR’s tweets long ago that he gave out misinformation about agents and the big publishers and that he hated literary agents. What annoyed me most was when I asked a specific agent a question and DR jumped in and gave me a response. It was completely false. I knew it, but I didn’t say anything. I put DR on my Block list so I wouldn’t receive any of his misinformed tweets.

    A lot of his tweets are lightly disguised agent bashing. Yes, I’m annoyed by it since I do want an agent, lol, and view them favorably in general – except for those who I know are incompetent at their jobs or straight up scammers. I’d be skeptical of any agent who submits work to DR’s small press. I wouldn’t want to be associated with him. I’m glad this issue is being brought to light (for the second time) for the less-informed writers and hopefully more writers will be skeptical of his tweets on the #askagent hash. He doesn’t belong on that hash tag.

  4. In the words of George Takei, “Oh Myyyyyyyyyyyyy.”

    Seriously, though, thank you for posting this. I’d just assumed this person created a small press and that was all there was to it. I was unaware of the test reader thing. As a LGBT writer, that’s the sort of thing that makes people like me a bit afraid to submit to anyone unless they specify that they represent LGBT. Unfortunately, I received that sort of advice a lot on query critique websites, including me being asked, “is it necessary to say your protagonist is gay?” and “don’t say your protagonist is gay; they won’t read it.” I feel sick to realize that I considered changing my query because of that sort of stuff. The inadvertent homophobia, whether intentional or not, just needs to stop.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s